Best No Revenue Share Prop Firm Software 2026

Revenue share can look inexpensive at launch and become one of the largest technology costs as a prop firm scales. This guide compares providers using fixed licensing, flat monthly, subscription or usage-based models without a headline percentage of firm revenue.

No-revenue-share software shortlist

Reviewed 1 September 2026. Provider claims and public prices can change; obtain a written quote for your exact operating scope.

The most transparent current entry points

Among the providers in this shortlist, Execurve and PropSim expose the clearest numerical entry points publicly. Execurve publishes PropScale starting at €740 per month for up to 500 traders and positions the CRM without revenue share. PropSim's current homepage publishes multiple subscription tiers, including a free tier and paid Launch, Scale and Enterprise plans, combined with credits tied to usage. However, another official PropSim page contains conflicting commercial information, so we flag its pricing rather than treating every public number as simultaneously current.

This distinction matters. Public pricing is valuable only when the pricing source itself is internally consistent. A buyer should not award transparency points merely because a number appears on a website.

Why founders look for 0% revenue share

Revenue-share pricing can reduce fixed cost before product-market fit, but the vendor charge grows with the revenue base. At a 10% share, $100,000 of qualifying monthly revenue implies $10,000 per month; $500,000 implies $50,000. Fixed or usage-based models can produce very different economics once the firm scales.

The comparison is still not as simple as percentage versus subscription. A revenue-share package may include engineering, integrations, infrastructure and support that a lower headline subscription leaves to third parties. Compare the same operating scope.

Four different ways to charge 0% revenue share

1. Flat monthly license

Propriotec represents the cleanest conceptual version: a monthly software relationship where the provider states there are no setup, per-account or revenue-share charges. The unresolved variable is the actual monthly quote.

2. Monthly license with published capacity

Execurve gives buyers a useful anchor by publishing a starting price tied to up to 500 traders. This makes early budgeting easier, but buyers still need the next capacity tiers before modeling a high-growth case.

3. Base fee plus account usage

PropForge states a flat monthly base plus a small per-active-account fee. This avoids sharing firm revenue but means software cost can still rise with account activity. Ask for the precise definition of an active account and model peak—not average—volume.

4. Subscription plus credits

PropSim uses a different model: subscription tiers combined with credits associated with funded traders. This can lower the barrier to starting, but it should be modeled as a usage-based system rather than a truly fixed-cost license.

Execurve / PropScale

Execurve's PropScale is notable because it combines no-revenue-share positioning with a published €740 monthly starting point for up to 500 traders. The operating layer covers challenge and funded-account lifecycle, KYC, payout workflows, risk, affiliate management, marketing attribution and developer access through REST APIs, WebSockets and webhooks. Researched platform coverage includes IntraQuote, MT4/MT5, cTrader and TradeLocker.

For procurement, the most important missing number is the price curve above the entry allowance. Ask for written scenarios at 2,000, 10,000 and 25,000 traders and clarify whether trader count means registered, active, funded or another billing definition. See our Execurve vs Propriotec comparison.

Propriotec

Propriotec publicly positions its model around flat monthly pricing with no setup fee, no per-account charge and no revenue share. Its product scope spans CRM, challenge operations, risk, KYC, payments and multiple trading-platform integrations. Exact monthly licensing remains quote-based, so request identical volume scenarios before comparing it with Execurve or a percentage-based competitor.

ZenPropTech

ZenPropTech emphasizes platform control and no revenue share alongside a custom end-to-end stack. The critical diligence issue is what ownership means contractually: source code, deployed instance, data, custom modules, domains, infrastructure and migration rights are separate assets.

PropForge

PropForge avoids revenue share but is not purely fixed-cost because its public commercial description includes a small per-active-account component alongside the monthly fee. That can still be attractive, but the unit economics should be tested at realistic scale.

Asgard Group

Asgard positions its offer around a setup fee plus fixed monthly licensing, 0% revenue share and no volume-based costs. Public terms also state a six-month minimum term before continuing until cancelled. Contract duration belongs in the cost model alongside the monthly headline.

Propify

Propify combines a white-label web trading platform, data feed and administration stack with flat-fee positioning. During our review, its official site contained inconsistent pricing references. We therefore classify current pricing as requiring clarification rather than selecting whichever visible number looks newest or cheapest.

PropSim

PropSim can be interesting for founders prioritizing a low barrier to entry. Its current homepage presents Free, Launch, Scale and Enterprise tiers at $0, $149, $599 and $1,999 per month respectively, with a credit model layered on top. Another official use-case page presents conflicting pricing and setup information. Treat the homepage as a useful current signal, not as contract-ready evidence. Confirm subscription, setup and credit economics before committing.

Model total cost, not the label

Build launch, base-case and high-growth scenarios. Include setup, subscription, account or trader usage, credits, trading platform, market data, KYC, payments, hosting, integrations, support and migration. Then compare those totals with the exact contractual revenue definition used by a revenue-share provider.

What 0% revenue share can still hide

• Account or trader tiers: the base license may cover only a defined capacity.
• Credits: a subscription can still have usage economics tied to funded traders or other events.
• Trading-platform charges: terminal and bridge economics may be separate.
• KYC, payments and payouts: these normally retain transaction or usage costs.
• Market data: particularly relevant when futures or specialized feeds are required.
• Implementation and migration: bespoke work can sit outside recurring licensing.
• Support tiers: dedicated support or tighter SLAs may cost more.
• Contract duration: minimum commitments affect effective launch risk.
• Exit and data portability: migration friction can dominate small license savings.

Buyer checklist before signing

• Request a complete fee schedule including pass-through costs.
• Model at least four account/trader volumes.
• Define active account, trader, funded trader and any other billing unit.
• Confirm supported trading platforms and who contracts with them.
• Confirm ownership and export rights for customer, trading and operational data.
• Document uptime, backups, incident response and disaster recovery.
• Test challenge-rule edge cases and breach calculations before production.
• Confirm KYC, payment and payout availability for target countries.
• Request migration, termination and minimum-term clauses before signing.

How we evaluate these providers

Prop Firm Vendors does not rank vendors based on affiliate commission. We compare public evidence, commercial transparency, stack coverage and buyer fit. Provider claims are identified as such, conflicting information is flagged, and missing information is not guessed.

FAQ

What is no-revenue-share prop firm software?

It is a commercial model where the technology provider does not take a percentage of the prop firm's qualifying revenue. Setup, subscription, license, usage or third-party fees can still apply.

Which no-revenue-share provider publishes a starting price?

In our current researched set, Execurve publishes PropScale from €740 per month for up to 500 traders. PropSim also publishes subscription tiers, but we flag conflicting pricing information elsewhere on its official site.

Does 0% revenue share mean fixed total cost?

No. Account volume, credits, KYC, payments, platform access, market data, hosting and integrations can remain variable.

Is flat fee always cheaper than revenue share?

No. The answer changes with revenue, scale and what each package includes. Compare identical operating scope across several growth scenarios.