Pricing intelligence · Verified 1 Sep 2026

PropLabel Pricing 2026

PropLabel publishes a hybrid commercial model: an upfront onboarding fee plus a monthly charge tied to revenue, subject to a minimum. This guide separates the headline numbers from the economics a prop-firm operator should model before signing.

PropLabel pricing at a glance

CostPublished structure
Standard onboarding€3,900 · provider states 14-day launch
Priority onboarding€5,900 · provider states 7-day launch
Monthly platform feeStarts at 10% revenue share OR €1,000 minimum
ScalingProvider says revenue share scales down to 5%

Source note: figures are published by PropLabel on its official start-a-prop-firm and white-label pages. Commercial terms can change; obtain a written proposal before relying on them.

What the hybrid model means

The €1,000 minimum matters at low revenue, while percentage pricing matters as sales rise. At €5,000 monthly revenue the stated 10% calculation is €500, so the €1,000 minimum would dominate. At €20,000, 10% is €2,000. At €50,000, the provider's published example is €5,000. The exact point at which lower percentage tiers apply should be confirmed in the contract.

Monthly firm revenue10% calculationHeadline fee before tier adjustments
€5,000€500€1,000 minimum
€10,000€1,000€1,000
€25,000€2,500€2,500
€50,000€5,000€5,000

These are arithmetic illustrations, not quotations. They exclude trading-platform, payment, KYC, liquidity, payout, tax and other third-party costs.

What PropLabel says is included

The provider describes a complete white-label operating layer including CRM, trader dashboards, affiliate functionality, rules and risk controls, custom-domain/branding infrastructure, technical support and updates. It lists integrations with MT4, MT5, cTrader, DXtrade, Match-Trader and TradeLocker.

“Included” should not automatically be read as “no third-party charge.” Ask which platform licences, data feeds, PSP charges, KYC checks, liquidity arrangements and other external services are invoiced separately.

Revenue share versus flat-fee software

PropLabel's model can reduce fixed software exposure for a new firm, but a successful firm's software bill can rise with revenue. A flat-fee provider behaves differently: fixed costs may be higher at launch but can become cheaper relative to revenue as the firm scales. There is no universal winner—the relevant metric is total technology cost at your expected revenue and account volume.

Compare flat fee vs revenue share → · See no-revenue-share providers →

Buyer questions before signing

Bottom line

PropLabel is one of the easier vendors in this market to model because meaningful commercial terms are public. The trade-off is structural: setup cost is modest relative to many enterprise stacks, but the revenue-linked component can become material as a firm grows. Model at least low, base and high-growth scenarios before comparing it with fixed-fee alternatives.

Read the PropLabel profile Find your technology stack