Asgard Group Pricing 2026: Fixed Licence, Setup Fee & Contract Terms
Asgard Group does not publish a universal dollar price for its prop-firm platform. Instead it scopes each project and issues a closed quote built around a one-off implementation/setup fee and a fixed recurring licence.
Asgard Group pricing at a glance
| Public exact price | Quote-based |
|---|---|
| Setup | One-off implementation/setup fee |
| Recurring charge | Fixed monthly licence |
| Revenue share | 0% stated |
| Volume-based costs | Provider states none |
| Minimum term | Six months |
| Cancellation | 60 days' written notice |
| Licence scope | One brand per licence |
How Asgard prices a prop-firm build
The provider says it first evaluates programmes, integrations and custom work, then sends a closed quote. This means two firms can receive different implementation figures even though the ongoing model remains a fixed licence rather than revenue share.
For procurement, ask the vendor to separate implementation, recurring licence, agreed integrations and any custom development. Work outside the scoped implementation can be quoted separately.
What the recurring licence includes
Asgard's public terms state that software, support and updates are included, along with integration work agreed during scoping. Its platform covers the operating layer around a prop firm, including challenge rules, risk, checkout, payments, KYC, payouts, affiliates and trader-facing infrastructure.
Trading-platform costs can still sit outside the licence
Asgard describes its architecture as sitting above the trading terminal. Market/execution providers can be contracted directly by the prop firm while Asgard maintains the connection. Therefore, a fixed Asgard licence should not automatically be interpreted as the entire technology cost of the business.
Why 0% revenue share matters
Asgard states that it takes no percentage of challenge fees, subscription revenue or trader economics. For a scaling firm, that separates vendor compensation from revenue growth. Compare this with our no-revenue-share software guide and flat fee vs revenue share analysis.
No volume-based costs: what to verify
The provider states that the licence has no volume-based costs. Buyers should still ask whether third-party execution, KYC, payment, market-data or other external services have their own usage charges. The distinction between vendor licence cost and total operating stack cost is essential.
Contract terms are unusually visible
Asgard publishes several terms buyers often do not discover until sales negotiations: a six-month minimum term, 60-day written cancellation notice, one brand per licence and a non-transferable licence. The company also states that it owns the platform and source code, including commissioned development, while customer trader and transaction data remains the customer's data.
Model the first year
Add direct contracts for execution/trading platforms and external KYC/payment/data services separately. This gives a more realistic total-cost comparison with all-in-one or usage-priced competitors.
Asgard vs PropForge
PropForge also states no revenue share, but publicly describes a flat monthly fee plus a small per-active-account fee. Asgard states no volume-based costs. That makes the variable-cost structure a central distinction. Read PropForge vs Asgard Group.
Asgard vs ZenPropTech
ZenPropTech also positions around no revenue share, but emphasizes a fully owned/custom platform model and quote-based scope. Asgard is explicit that it owns its platform/source code and licenses it to the client. This ownership distinction matters for buyers prioritizing technical sovereignty. See ZenPropTech vs Asgard Group.
Questions to ask before signing
- What is the exact implementation fee?
- What is the monthly licence for our required integrations?
- Which external provider contracts are required?
- What custom work falls outside the quoted scope?
- Can the six-month minimum or notice period change?
- What happens to integrations and data exports on exit?
- Does a second brand require a second full licence?
- What SLA is written into the agreement?
- Which custom functionality can be reused for other Asgard clients?
Bottom line
Asgard offers one of the clearer public descriptions of contract structure even though it does not disclose an exact price. The strongest commercial signal is fixed licensing with 0% revenue share and no stated volume-based platform costs. The main diligence points are the quote itself, minimum term, external platform costs and the fact that the underlying software remains Asgard's intellectual property.